Visiting Fellow Angela Maria Kelley Speaks About Biases of Immigration, Nationality

Angela Maria Kelley, immigration consultant, speaks to history professor Wes Dick's class during the week of March 25. Kelley spent the week as a Woodrow Wilson Fellow and spoke about immigration issues and realities. (Photo courtesy of the Ford Institute.)

Angela Maria Kelley, immigration consultant, visited Albion from March 25 to 27. With her experience as the senior strategic adviser for immigration at the Open Society Foundations and Open Society Policy Center, she held open dialogue discussions, class lectures and a public speech on immigration realities.

Kelley visited as a Woodrow Wilson Fellow, a program that sends experts on a host of topics to college campuses through the Council of Independent Colleges.

Kelley serves to protect immigrants of certain nationalities from biases

Kelley initially worked with clients of domestic violence but shifted to clients who fled their war-torn countries to the U.S. to apply for asylum and become naturalized citizens.

Kelley found immigration through her work with domestic violence cases. Often, refugees, usually women, stayed in relationships because their abusive significant other held their right to a green card, visa or work permit. She couldn’t help her clients without encountering immigration conflicts.

Kelley aims to change the legislation on immigration policies that have not been updated since 1990. Kelley found it frustrating representing clients with strong legal cases but still losing the battles.

“I wasn’t losing because I was a lousy lawyer,” she said. “I was losing because I was representing people who were coming from a country, El Salvador, who were coming from a country that we supported, that our government gave lots of money to and that our government did not want to admit to committing the rights of violations.”

During the 1980’s El Salvador civil war, the United States sent billions of dollars to the country hoping to prevent the spread of communism. The money was sent for economic and military aid that led to a powerful Salvadoran army committing violent crimes on innocent Salvadorans who fled their country for safety.

Kelley said most refugees experience threats by violent acts — such as murders, maiming or kidnapping — personally or on someone they know.

“I would lose those cases because the person was from El Salvador,” said Kelley. Kelley learned the disparity in her cases because identical cases from one nation would not receive asylum while others wouldl merely because of their non-El Salvadoran nationality. If the client was from El Salvador but from a different background, such as Nicaragua, the client would have a better chance at winning asylum in the United States.

Hoping to change immigration policies, Kelley, along with other advocates, are urging the federal government to update what they consider the broken Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007.

Her first step to modify the Comprehensive Immigration Reform is to help immigrants without papers reach the path to citizenship. On average, undocumented immigrants in the U.S. have stayed for 13 years and most arrived when they were babies, she said. These immigrants are known as DREAMers. Other immigrants include refugees who arrived from war-torn countries who have received U.S. protection and work authorization but not legal citizenship.

Kelley also strives to update the legal immigration system for immigrants with diverse work skills and long backlogs to stay closer with their families in the United States.

For example, if Kelley’s daughter, who was born and lived in La Paz, Bolivia and Kelley is a U.S. citizen and tries to bring her over, that could take about seven years. But Kelley’s 18-year-old wouldn’t take “any time at all,” she said.  

Today, the United States has the same number of visas it had in 1990. “So it’s just bizarre that we’re such a smart country, but yet we have these laws that don’t make sense for the last century, much less even in the century before,” said Kelley.

Kelley also works to change immigration enforcement to maintain strong borders and border security. As Kelley says, the U.S. government spends nearly $18 billion on immigration enforcement. Only $14.5 billion is the budget for all the federal law enforcement agencies, including the Drug Enforcement Administration, Secret Service and sheriffs.

“It’s important because we do want to keep out people who mean to do us harm and we want to keep out drugs in this country,” said Kelley.

In her insights on immigration policies for the next 10 years Kelley said, “I think if we can get Democrats in the House and Senate that we could pass immigration legislation that would help DREAMers and would address a lot of the problems that I’ve been talking about.”

About Irene Corona-Avila 48 Articles
Irene is a fourth-year student and a prideful Georgia Peach from Atlanta. She is a biochemistry major with a minor in . Aside from running and writing, you can find Irene dancing freely or talking up a pun. She's currently reading a book on gravity, but she can't seem to put it down.

1 Comment

  1. Angela Maria Kelley appeared today on 1A brilliantly articulating the case in a manner that sounds like a way forward, even of those who see immigration is a threat.
    Presenting her solutions as a means that serve their purposes.
    Example: Need: We want to reduce the number of people coming in. Solution: Keep them where they are or send them somewhere else.
    Seeing your ideas as solution to the problems as they define them.
    Not criticizing their proposals as harmful or offensive or wasteful.
    You don’t convince people they’re wrong and how you are right.
    Here are rules for engaging these people:
    1. Master the problem as they see it from their point of view.
    Start by articulating their concerns and defining the problem like they would.
    Apply your solutions to the problems as they see them. Show how they serve their objectives.
    2) Accept the goals, interests, and values they have chosen, as they understand and define them. (You are not condoning the reasons for their choices: stereotypes, fear, anger.) Unless you do that, the discussion is not about solutions but about the merit of their choices. The instant people perceive disrespect for their goals, interests, and values, the interaction is no longer about the original purpose– it is now about defending dignity.
    3) To do this you must Understand their story and forget yours.
    Stories are
    – Are interpretations of facts
    – Explain what we see and hear
    — Reveal our emotional stake in the situation.
    – Help use evaluate the situation
    – Tell us what we should do about the situation
    – Once told they take on a life of their own
    The story I make up is an explosive device. Often the story I make up includes my thoughts about my motivations and motivations of the person I am talking with. The story I make up reeds as a judgment of the person, such as “he’s unfeeling” or “she’s selfish.”
    4) If you can’t arrive on a mutual purpose, invent one.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.